Some of our neighbors here in the City of Los Altos are opposed to allowing the 40-year tenant at Hillview Community Center – Children’s Corner – remain a tenant at the planned new Hillview Center. They object even though Children’s Corner is paying their way in full, paying off of all of the “extra” construction costs over 20 years, and even though the City will own the “extra” 3,000 square foot facility (5,500 including outdoor play) now and always.
Council member Jean Mordo estimates the $1.5M of cash reserves the City would would “invest”/spend in 2019 to build Hillview space for the daycare non-profit would return 15% over a 20 year lease. [Here is my old post based on an earlier proposed lower downpayment by the daycare center – estimate 7-9% return].
FAKE NEWS: Some of our neighbors are unwittingly spreading incendiary FAKE NEWS — like that there are 1500 MVLA adult ed senior students a year being served at our current Hillview who will lose service. Not true. See below. OR news like…the City Rec. Director told MVLA there was no space for the program at the new Hillview. Not true. See below.
Council Discussion/Decision postponed till TBD
The Nov. 28 City Council meeting agenda included an item which was to vote on whether to approve the 20 year lease agreement with Children’s corner. However, no action was taken because the item was continued to a “date uncertain, TBD. The Los Altos Council hopes to get more information about the city budget forecast and to find possible donors to the new Hillview project.
The latest “grass-roots movement” to evict Children’s Corner has claimed that the current MVLA high school district adult ed. classes at Hillview are being terminated because the current Tam & Noll plan for a new Hillview is too small to fit them in. This opposition campaign alleges that some 1500 senior “students” of classes such as Qiqong exercise, painting, knitting, and German conversation now held at Hillview between 9am and 3 pm are going to be left high and dry.
The campaign rhetoric pits seniors vs. toddlers
Examples of public rhetoric at the Nov. 28 meeting
One public speaker at the Nov. 28 City Council meeting described the Los Altos seniors in the surrounding area as needy and deserving, whereas the students at Children’s Corner were “princes and princesses and should select a cheaper daycare elsewhere.” [Lalahpolitico: Who has verified the competitive prices of daycare in our area? ]
Another public speaker repeated the tired, hysterical trope…we’re “giving away our land” to Children’s Corner. [Lalahpolitico: How can a 20 year lease agreement — wherein the City OWNS the land now AND always OWNS the new Children’s corner improvements on it during the lease and after the lease — be called “giving away land” or be called giving away funds. Don’t words have fixed meanings anymore? ]
This speaker also implied that council members who did not insist on a Request For Proposal (RFP) from other daycare providers besides Children’s Corner were “not being transparent”, were acting beyond their “authority”, and implied they betrayed your election vote for them. [Lalahpolitico: Tell us how you really feel! I can find no legalese that says a City must do a RFP, aka, is “required” for this situation. This lease is not a construction contract agreement with a builder. And Yes, Council has authority to do leases! ]
Some public speakers were dismayed that seniors did not have “3 times as much” as now. “How could such an affluent community, an official CAFE ‘age friendly city,’ not have more for seniors, and at the very least keep every single one of the MVLA classes at the times most convenient for seniors.”
“Why do we not have a separate 10,000 square foot Senior Center like Mountain View, or Sunnyvale, or Cupertino.” WHY? ANSWER; those cities have a very much larger PROPERTY TAX BASE of commercial and offices. That MORE than offsets the somewhat cheaper housing. They also have much larger residential populations as well. Let’s remember that us residents of Los Altos and Los Altos Hills can — in general — partake of senior services at all those cities if we want too. Lalahpolitico: You see, our city is actually tax poor. LAH is even worse off to hear it from them. [See prior posts about senior commission frictions]
Jean Mordo says MVLA classes being kicked out of Hillview is Fake News.
Mordo singles out Nextdoor.com and bulk email campaigns as the transmission disease vector for the misinformation about the Hillview project, about MVLA adult ed, and about Children’s Corner. [See this post — one of many on this site about the Hillview Task Force planning meetings — to learn how nicely the Hillview plan is progressing. Lalahpolitico: That old Hillview building is gonna fall down! “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”]
Here is Manny Hernandez saying senior MVLA classes can fit in the new Hillview as planned,
then called a liar by citizen
At the Nov. 28 meeting, Hernandez reminds us he has 20 years of experience building recreation facility schedules for cities. He says current senior-oriented MVLA adult ed courses at Hillview – 9am – 3pm can fit at the new Hillview. He says the vast majority of MVLA courses can be at the new Hillview, though the LAYC might also be used.
In either April or May 2017 (their personal calendar records differ, but it is immaterial), Hernandez met with MVLA adult ed director, Keith Moody at his offices in Mountain View on Castro Street. Let’s note that it was not until September 2017 that anything much was known about the real square footage of the new Hillview facility.
Recall that the first meeting of the new Hillview planning committee – aka the volunteer Hillview Task Force — was June 15, 2017. The Hillview Task Force spent a couple of months on process, on reviewing prior City research documents/ and actions and selecting an architect. A “concept plan” for a new Hillview building has slowly emerged only in the last three months.
At the spring 2017 meeting between the City and MVLA — before anything concrete was known about the size of the new Hillview — Hernandez informed MVLA adult ed Director Keith Moody and assistant director, Brenda Harris…
“that we [MVLA] would need to find a substitute facility during construction of the new center and that there MIGHT NOT be any room for the adult ed. programs, when the new center is completed.”
…All parties agree this was the message communicated then at that spring meeting. Mr. Moody says the risk of being shut out at the new building was a big surprise to him that spring.
[Lahlapolitico: Yes, I sympathize that the possibility of termination of the relationship would be bad news…as it has been over the years for Friends of the Library, the Youth Theater and Children’s Corner when they were told they warned about loss of space. But was it not prudent and even kind for Hernandez to tell MVLA about the risk? Hernandez did not create the risk. Everybody who in 2015 voted NO on Measure A to create a 55,000 square foot community center created the risk, and we killed the expansion of senior activities at Hillview.The best case now is keeping the senior activities level pretty much the same…but in a nice, new, spiffy facility. Don’t let the optimal be the enemy of the good again.]
This is November 2017 now; there is much more certainty about what the new Hillview facility will look like and how big it will be...18,000 square feet plus 3,000 more if the Children’s Corner lease is approved. Still less than the 25,000 feet at the old Hillview [17,000 used for city programs…the rest leased out.]
Both Manny Hernandez and Keith Moody agree on what time slots seniors like vs. what adults like/need. The generalization is that seniors like to leave home between 9 to 3 M-F … to avoid the hassle of traffic. They like to eat dinner early and go to bed early. The generalization is that working adults, moms, and kids are at work, working at home, or at school from 9-3.
Accordingly, our City Recreation Dept. does not offer much in the way of non-senior activity from 9-3: there is some adult yoga at Garden House in Shoup Park. Lalahpolitico: there will be little or no contention for ANY of the facilities at the new Hillview between 9am to 3pm. The seniors will pretty much have the run of the place! If a stay-at-home mom wants to join any of the MVLA adult ed classes, she can; you just pay a bit more for being under 55.
Google is awesome…Wow Fun Fact: Keith Moody earned a Super Bowl Championship with the Raiders in 1981. https://www.greatersyracusesportshalloffame.com/keith-moody. bio
Debunking “Fake” Statistics –
1500 senior MVLA students a year?
no room for MVLA at the new Hillview…
It was today that I phoned MVLA adult ed director Keith Moody. Last week he had a phone call with a citizen and shared a year of MVLA adult ed course enrollment statistics at Hillview with her/him. She/he shared the ~10 page .pdf with me and at least one other person. This data is the basis for Mr. Moody telling the citizen in that phone call that the program served 1500 “learners” a year. Sadly, the citizen changed the quote to 1500 STUDENTS a year. Wrong.Ouch.
The MVLA adulted program is a “trimester” program. I delved into the Fall 2017 data that was sent. It was clear that the file was a listing of enrollment data per course. For example 38 people enrolled in a morning Qiqong course. A “seat” slot in a course is not the same thing as a student.
I asked Mr. Moody about their “counting” terminology there at MVLA vs. the terms used in the universities where my husbands have worked. At a college, an individual who took one or more courses during the year would be called “one student.” The individual is not counted multiple times for each course he takes that year!
Mr Moody explained that the data he gave the citizen was for “duplicated learners.” MVLA can also run reports on “unduplicated learners.” That later concept is what most institutions call a student, for that trimester, or for that year, depending on the reporting period. So there was no attempt to mislead by Mr. Moody; let’s say that the citizen made an innocent error and ran with it. Lalahpolitico could have asked MVLA to run the report for “unduplicated learners” for the past 3 trimesters, but I wont’ bother them for that. He retires Dec. 15!
Will MVLA fit into the new Hillview
A public speaker at the Nov. 28 council meeting said he spent 9 hours analyzing the full “MVLA enrollments at Hillview” data, plus the City classes at Hillview. He concludes that though much can fit; some is not going to be accommodated, at least not at the most preferred time, 9-3pm. I agree with him. Lalahpolitico: But can that timing inconvenience ….for at most a couple hundred seniors… be eliminated by not letting Children’s Corner build the City an extra 3000 square feet at Hillview? No. The daycare is paying for all of the 3,000 feet, not the City! It just won’t be built.
Lalahpolitico analyzed the Fall 2017 MVLA enrollment 2017 data. I concluded all the major, most popular classes can be accomodated 9 -3pm. Some of MVLA’s small 10 seat enrollment classes – which are are foreign language classes – may need to adjust times/locations. I assume that there is no use of the 4 key rooms at the new Hillview – Movement, Arts, MPR1, MPR2 – by a City run class from 9 to 3pm. This was just an exercise.
For each day of the week in the spread sheet above look at the column labeled “new Hillview room” to see how that course section fits. You can find a floorplan with names of rooms at the new Hillview below. I agree that the a few of the low enrollment foreign language classes will be difficult to place. Longer term, the proposed new library building might be a good location for this type of class. MVLA Useage at Hillview .xlsx
1500 MVLA “seats” is how many individuals served a year?
At the Nov. 28 meeting, several seniors who currently use the MVLA programs regularly spoke warmly about the role of MVLA in their lives. They spoke of their “community” around the Qiqong classes held in each trimester, year after year. They spoke of their “community” of writers who take the Memoir writing class, trimester after trimester, year after year. They spoke of the “community” who take the painting classes again and again.
Obviously, for these seniors, it’s not just about the individual activity, the satisfaction of skill building…it’s the opportunity for socializing with close acquaintances. Perhaps the largest part of the use of non-lounge Hillview classrooms 9 to 3 pm is by nominal set of individuals who enroll continuously each term.
Obviously, in terms of the numbers, way, way less than 1500 senior individuals a year are using Hillview “non-lounge” classrooms from 9am to 3pm. For example, suppose each senior individual enrolls in just one MVLA class a trimester, but repeats the class each trimester. 1500 “class seats” a year reduces to 500 distinct individuals served per year. Etc.
And judging from the public speakers Nov. 28, of those senior MVLA individuals taking up non-lounge classroom space at Hillview, about half live in Mountain View and surrounding areas. Please realize that the instructors of the MVLA courses at Hillview also give THE SAME COURSES at Mountain View Senior Center. Are you a senior who wants to do Qiqong 4 days a week with the same instructor? Just go 2 days at MV and 2 days at Hillview, following the instructor.
How many seniors buy the City’s annual $30-40 senior program membership? Manny Hernandez reports that it has risen from over 200 a few years ago to 420 today. 100 of that growth is attributed to the addition of the Grand Rd. senior program; that means around about 320 senior individuals a year might use Hillview rooms for a lounge or a course. Senior membership entitles a person to a special senior activity newsletter, some activity fee discounts, donation based Friday meals at Hillview, and home repairs volunteer help. A Los Altos senior membership is not required to participate in City senior activities or MVLA senior courses.
No one has estimated the overlap between the yearly 320 City senior program members and the 500 or so MVLA class takers.
The closet NIMBYs among us.
As Joe Simitian says…
give them your understanding
…we are all NIMBYs some of the time
Lalahpolitico Musings —
Why do some people constantly ask for more red tape, more reviews, more process, more steps, more research, more community input, more democracy, more master plans…rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat?
It is true that the City has started attempts to improve/replace the old Hillview building MULTIPLE TIMES since 1997. And nothing came of those attempts. Because this is small government jurisdiction, not a private company, everything goes much slower than in the private sector…it’s not that people who do this work for salaries or as volunteers are inept, corrupt or dim-witted.
It’s how the current rules of representive democracy at a municipality level work… so slow that the people in charge – Councils, City Managers, much of staff – are coming and going and coming and going. With each change in leadership, the new team needs to get acclimated…some citizens clamour to start over because there was something in the old abandoned plan for Hillview [or whatever] they did not like…
…can we see that nothing will ever get built if we constantly listen to naysayers…”wait…what about this…what about that? Wait, this is not good enough, it could be more perfect.”
…I am beginning to think these people [closet NIMBYs perhaps?] who are asking for more and more study and more and more community engagement are doing so because they actually don’t want a community center of any kind anywhere near them. If you listen you may also hear them ask for fewer programs, and more “unprogrammed space.” They could be more direct and just say, “Give me a blank, unimproved Hillview park with no visitors and no traffic.” But they don’t want to seem like NIMBYs.