LASD Trustees visited the Bullis Charter Board meeting to publically discuss the Kohls 10th site on the night of Oct. 1, 2018. BCS board members expressed NO interest in occupying the site short-term or long-term. Instead, they expressed skepticism about the whole planning process. They feel the North of El Camino community may have been misled and will be disappointed if the Kohls 10th site is not a neighborhood school. However, they are looking forward to working closely and collaboratively with LASD trustees to plan and design for the long-term needs of BCS. BCS trustees did NOT say they would never, ever consider occupying the 10th site. They were “concerned.”
There are three Youtube videos of the 2 hour session. Fear not. You can skim the video using our handy subject matter guide to the video which includes time stamps to selectively view snippets in the video.
Part 1 LASD presentations – about 20 minutes
Part 2 BCS Questions Trustees Bryan Johnson and Vladamir Ivanovich – about one hour
Part 3 BCS Comments on the Kohls 10th site situation – about 30 minutes
If you only have time for one and want to hear BCS board member opinion, look at Part 3 on Youtube.
If you want to hear LASD Trustee answers, look at Part 2 on Youtube.
In Part 1 on Youtube you can hear 8 public speakers, including John Radford, former LASD trustee Tamara Logan, and LASD volunteer Sharon Clay.
If you leave this post and view directly on Youtube, be sure to tap on CLICK MORE to see the timed links.
If you just want to read, and not take the time to view and listen, then just read the ‘nuggets’ about the Kohls 10th site and my timed listening notes below.
Some nuggets to
READ now about the
Kohls 10th site
The Kohls 10th site is 9.5 acres not 11.5. About 4 acres of the 9.5 is to be school open space that the District has promised to MV to be used as a park outside of school hours. [BCS hours are 7am to 5pm because of extracurriculars]
The Kohls 10th site deal details like final cost might be released as soon as Oct. 8 at the regular LASD Trustee meeting.
The TDRs transactions will close sooner than you think.
Virtually all LASD Trustee and staff deciding, studying and planning about the Kohls 10th site will occur AFTER the purchase closes.
Hence, the first traffic study ever of the Kohls 10th site will be the one in the CEQA. [ California Environmental Quality Assurance process.]
CEQA will take 12 months. Then the design will take 12 months. Then the build. This Kohls 10th site school is a multi-year process [2022 is probably the earliest opening]
The 10th site Task Force was “not allowed” to consider alternative solutions to Kohls 10th site such as using existing capacity.
LASD is 500 students SHORT of what it forecast for 2018-2019 in the 5-year agreement. Meanwhile, BCS MET its forecast of growth to 900 students for 2018-2019 per the 5-year agreement.
Four years ago, the LASD architect Gelfand Partners drew a plan for a k-8 school (650 students) on 14 acres. [But the Kohls 10th site is 9.5 acres and BCS is over 900 students, whereas a NEC k-6 school would fit better]
There is empty building capacity [rooms, interior space] and portables at Oak, Loyola, Springer and Blach schools.
VIDEO GUIDE with YOUTUBE links
Guide to part 1
8:31 Bryan Johnson seemed to present an “olive branch.” Please send a board member to our LASD meeting Oct. 8. Let’s have at least one meeting of both entire boards sometime later.”
13:20 Bryan Johnson. We have not finalized the decision on what students should be on the Kohls 10th site. On what school design might be there. It might be a multi-step process over the next several years.
15:20 Public Speaker One. Don’t put BCS on the Kohl’s 10th site [Pro BCS]
16:35 Speaker Two. She favors expanding the land and facilities. Take the “easiest way.” Don’t put the burden solely on LASD to come up with the perfect solution. [Pro LASD]
17:40 Speaker Three. Lives in the Covington School Area and her children attend there. Don’t make this a zero-sum game. The Covington area can’t handle the traffic, if 1200 students were there. Not just the residents would suffer. But also the commuters from 280 who use El Monte, etc. [Pro LASD]
17:44 Speaker Four- John Radford. I moved to Los Altos Hills in 1998. I led the campaign for the first parcel tax. About 6 months later, the LASD trustees closed Bullis Purissima School. Yet 4 years ago, when LASD Trustee Sangeeth Peruri asked me to sign the YES on the $150 M Measure N endorsement in the voter ballot – I did. But I did so with these promises. N must solve the BCS issue. And I made a pledge to voters – the Radford Pledge – that before the board would act on any solution, they would explain “How much it will cost.” After 4 years there has been absolutely no progress on the issue. I hold both boards accountable. I blame both boards. What I see now is a hardening of positions on both sides. We to solve the problem or else we’ll be back to the Prop 39 process year after year. [????]
23:25 Speaker Five – Tamara Logan. I am shocked by the amount of effort being expended to stop the acquisition of new land at the Kohls 10th site. Yes, our growth is flat [if you include the growth of the charter]. I was here when the 1998 board made the mistake of closing someone else’s school. [There was no board member from Bullis-Purissima school that year]. I can tell you about a board member who was a proponent of closing schools. Later his son was bullied about it in junior high. [Lalahpolitico: This incident dates to the earlier closure of Portola School and the lease of Eastwood in the 1980’s. It is not related to the 1998 closures. ] It would be bad to lose the community peace we have had in the past 4 years with the “5-year agreement.” This new land is a facility for BCS.
[Pro LASD, Ms. Logan is a former LASD trustee. Last November LASD asked for mediated negotiations as the process for creating the next 5-year or other long-term agreement. It was requested even though 2 members from both boards have been meeting amiably for the past 4 years. LASD decided to insert two expired, antagonistic Trustees – Tamara Logan and Doug Smith – as their representatives along with Bryan Johnson and Steve Taglio. ]
25:50 Speaker Six – Sharon Clay. I second what John Radford had to say. [Both boards need to stop hardening] I support using the Kohls 10th site for BCS. It would be much easier for LASD to plan facilities if “BCS could stabilize. It could choose to stay its current size. It could self-limit its size.” Also, it could choose to drop the admission preference for residents in the LAH Bullis-Purissima attendance area. [Lalahpolitico: This was dropped about 3 years ago. Sharon did not get the memo! BCS has no preferences, except for siblings and its teachers.]
29:01 Speaker Seven – A resident of Los Altos and BCS parent, she also owns her prior home in the Crossings. A couple of weeks ago I organized a meeting for the Crossings and the other condo complex next door there. We have been asking for crossing guards at El Camino and Jordan for 4 years. We asked again. [Bryan Johnson says they are coming real soon now.]
At that meeting parents said
– We are separated into 3 schools. It is hard to take kids to playdates or do homework together
– We deserve a neighborhood school
– And stop calling us low-income people. We are not. Yes, there are a few in the greater North of El Camino Area.
The speaker continued on to say, I see that BCS has provided healthy competition and LASD has been improving a lot. I agree with the concept of more schools using the BCS model. I think it will work for a school serving mainly low-income students. Yes, we have rent control – but that is just the few old buildings built before 1995. All the new building going up are luxury – there will be almost no low-income students from there. [Pro BCS]
32:25 Speaker Eight – I have friends at LASD. Together we worked hard to pass N and GG. We were promised results. Yes, the concept of acquiring a 10th site is fine. But this actual site – the 9.5 acres Kohls site – has problems. I want to say no one at BCS had ever advocated closing a 10th site. [ Lalahpolitico: It is true no one official or semi-official at BCS has ever uttered those words to my knowledge. However many community members – for example, City Council member Jan pepper — have suggested that redrawing attendance areas is a very common practice. You can read that redraw ‘solution’ all the time in community online comment venues.]
Guide to part 2
BCS board members
question Johnson and Ivanovich
BCS Board members took turns asking the LASD trustees questions. The BCS board members took their turn from the left end of the table to the right end as you view it in the video. Both LASD’s Bryan Johnson and Vladamir Ivanovich gave answers.
00:30 – First BCS Board Member. David Jacques. How willing a selling was Federal? What is the portability of these TDRs? There is little precedent for this. ANSWER: VI: this info is not in the public domain. BJ: We sold all the square footage. We have strong backup interest in purchase.
3:10 – Second speaker. Anne Waterman Roy. What is your enrollment growth this year? It looks like you have space capacity now? But you say there might be a spike up in the future? What data analysis do you have?
If enrollment declined 500 students over the past 5 years why not put any future spike in the District’s current empty spots?
ANSWER: BJ: There are 1600 units approved. Even at 1/10 a kid per unit that will generate several hundred kids. Also the north end schools – Santa Rita, Almond are all FULL. [Lalahpolitico: The district has been redefining capacity. Full used to mean <700, then <600 and now between 300-500 feels full to LASD…moving the goal posts. Not a single school including the junior highs is close to 700 today Oct. 6, 2018] BJ continued..yes there are other solutions, but it will better if we have the flexibility of a campus at Kohls 10th site long-term. We want more flexibility long-term.
07:05 Ann Waterman Roy. I worked for the Boston School District. I note that your demographer used a “yield” of 1/2 student per housing unit. His forecasts for the area have turned out to be lower than the forecast. A little redrawing of boundaries would be relatively easy [to make better use of the currently unused capacity in the system]
09:00 VI: You are ignoring the 900 students at BCS. With that, enrollment is flat.
09:45 If the Kohls 10th site deal fell through, are there other solutions? ANSWER: BJ: Yes, we looked at those at the Sept. 27 board meeting. But this Kohls 10th site is the best solution for all people, especially NEC. It adds 4 acres of open space at a school to the NEC area.
10:40 Overall all enrollment ( BCS plus LASD) is up over 1000 student over 10 years. [Lalahpolitico: Correct, 900 of it is at BCS!]
11:40You say Kohls is the best option. Which other options were considered?
ANSWER: For example we looked at putting two schools on Covington. That means tearing down the old school and building two new schools, not just one new school like with the 10th site solution. As with a house, extensive remodeling is not cheaper than tearing down and building new.
13:35 Andrea Eyring. Can you explain more about the 11.5 acres at the Kohls 10th site being sold by Federal Realty. What is the use of the Greystar purchased 2 acres?
ANSWER: It is a 24/7days a week city park. There is no use for the school’s programs.
14:00 Eyring: In other words, the Kohls 10th site is a 9.5 acre school site. What made you think that was enough for a large enrollment school?
ANSWER: We saw the example in Menlo Park of the new public Hillview Middle School (6,, 7, 8 grades) with about 1000 students on a 10 acres site. [ It used to be an elementary school which was torn down.]
15:15 Eyring: [But that is 3 grades, and they have a common shareable facility need. We are k-8. Lower grades need specialized outdoor and indoor areas.] What is the time frame for an analysis of how many students in various grade configurations could be accommodated there?
ANSWER: BJ: You should help drive that in conversation with us and you. You tell us if you are interested in all or some of the Kohls 10th site…short-term…long-term.
16:15 Eyring: You say Santa Rita and Almond are Full, even the portables? You could replace those with Measure N. What is the capacity of just the buildings? ANSWER BJ: I can get you that number.
17:05 Eyring: Why is there just a demographer’s presentation and no full report this year?
ANSWER VI: We switched to a 2-year update cycle.
17:45 Eyring: Can you tell us what the enrollment is this fall? ANSWER: I don’t know it.
18:05 Eyring: How is it cheaper to use new land?
ANSWER: BJ: Using existing land means tearing down most of an old school and building 2 campus. Plus it is very disruptive to tear down the old school.
19:30 Eyring: What is the Importance of a neighborhood school in the NEC area?
ANSWER: BJ Actually the most important thing is the “educational outcomes” for the NEC residing students. Parents there are very satisfied with their current schools [ Lalahpolitico: implies the NEC parents are satisfied with going to either Santa Rita, Covington, or Almond. Elides the question?] Students are not widgets to move around. A school community should not be moved.
21:55 Rich Ying: So is it your intention to house BCS there?
ANSWER: VI – I didn’t say that. BJ: Let’s not conflate a permanent facility for BCS with the Kohls 10th site. VI: I can tell you that at least one LASD board member does not want to put BCS there.
23:15 Rich Ying – Have you considered the TDR risk factors?
The TDR Contracts Could fall through? VI: There is a waiting list to buy them
BJ: The worst case scenario is we own a valuable piece of land with all its development rights intact.[ Not bad at all.]
25:30 Do you have a back-up plan…you could be buying at the top of the market…and then get caught in a fall?
BJ: Yes we have looked into that
27:00 After you close on the site how long till you design the school and open the school?
ANSWER: The first thing is a CEQA process. [California Environment Quality Assurance act] That would take 12 months. Construction would be at least 12 months. This is a multi-year process.
28:15 Next Board Member – Let’s get back to the EIR – Environmental Impact Report. Have you identified the gating factors?
ANSWER: VI – We have started a CEQA process. We have done them in the past, and we don’t think it’s going to be an issue.
29:35 You say planning for a school is premature now. But I worry that you are not going to design to a budget; but are going to be trying to find a budget for an unknown design. You are saying you are going to rightsize the design only AFTER you acquire the site.
ANSWER: And after we talk to you all at BCS about your needs
30:45 When will the TDRs materialize to finalize a construction budget?
ANSWER BJ: It won’t be long.
31:50: Some of the key themes on the Thought Exchange online discussion board were Safety and Transportation. Have you considered how to mitigate the issue of traffic at the Kohl’s 10th site?
ANSWER: BJ: no we can’t decide that till after we decide who is housed there.
32:40 The pedestrian and bike access and safety is rather poor in the area. Sidewalks are quite narrow. DID YOU DO A TRAFFIC STUDY or a traffic discussion? How will you address the issues around the Kohls 10th site?
34:20 ANSWER: VI: The CEQA process will bring out any issues in detail. And the City of MV says it is responsible. [Yes, sort of, Mayor Lenny Siegel said the city is working to handle all the traffic from the new offices and new housing units in the area. For example MV is asking Caltrain for more stops at that station. Lalahpolitico: That may help indirectly…but…]
34:50 With respect to maximizing current resources, If the deal does not close what would the back-up plan be?
ANSWER: If you see our Sept. 24 LASD trustee meeting we looked at some options there. You can see those in the presentation. We have nothing detailed about those. For example, if you – BCS – are planning enrollment expansion, we should have to take that into account when considering backup alternatives to the 10th site.
36:20 How much new housing are you assuming in NEC?
ANSWER: Well, 1600 unit have been approved by the city. That does not mean a shovel in the ground. Greystar at the old Safeway is approved for 600, the old Dittmer’s site is more than 600; there are 400 units going in behind the Target store.
38:00 With more units and more traffic how can you not prioritize a neighborhood school on the Kohls 10th site?
ANSWER: BJ: The need is not there immediately for that. The capacity will be there 20 and 30 years from now. Two points. A permanent home for BCS is a high priority. Its attendance may change over time. Therefore the use of the 10th site might change over a longer time.
40:10 Ms. Roa: If BCS is there, what shall we do with NEC kids? Why was this Del Medio Park forum with NEC residents and families held only last week? Weren’t they being considered?
ANSWER BJ: This was not the first time we talked to NEC folks.
42:55 Dr. Suttcliffe
So BCS may be placed at the Kohls 10th site? Are there projections of NEC student enrollments to fill a neighborhood school?
So BCS being there might not be permanent, but just till NEC grows?
44:00 How can BCS be included in the design of a school there?
VI: We will consult with you about your needs an interests. We would not put you in a 17-story building.
45:25 What would the short-term plans be for BCS till this school opens in 2022?
46:45Joe Hurd. I have 4 or 5 questions
1) explain again how come the 10th site is 9.5 not 11.5 acres. How many acres are for building and parking (5) vs. open space(4)?
2) Confirm that Santa Rita, Almond, Covington, Egan are at capacity? YES. So the rest are not at capacity? Correct?
If the target capacity is 500, then a number of schools are significantly <500? YES
3) Have you released your 2018 LASD only enrollment numbers? NO [Probably know Wed. Oct. 3] [Lalahpolitico: down almost 160]
4) About the 10th site Task Force, was it allowed to consider reconfiguration of existing LASD properties?
ANSWER: NO their mandate was to assume the 10th site went forward and to consider who should be there.
5) Have you hear of the group Creative Facilities Solutions? Yes. Has the District invited them to present to LASD? No. [However Bryan Johnson did attend a CFS event at Hillview Community Center last May]
52:15 You seem to say “When a school is working well, don’t disrupt it.” Do you agree the same logic applies to BCS?
ANSWER: Sure I agree
Guide to part3
01:00 David Jacques. I challenge the idea that there will be a significant number of occupants with kids in the new NEC developments.
03:20 Ann Waterman Roy. I appreciate that you need to balance needs. However, I wonder if there really is such extensive enrollment growth than it can’t be handled with existing capacity.
04:50 A. W. Roy. When you consider BCS needs for the short and long term, please make it a dialogue. Don’t just ask us for a list and throw it over the wall for you to process it, and then you throw it over the wall back at us.
06:10 Andrea Eyring. I was on the Bullis Purissima PTA board the year it closes and on the Covington PTA board the year it opened. We agreed to the split the into two sites to achieve the 5-year agreement. It has been hard on teachers to shoulder the intercampus commuting. Right now my kids are grown. I am not commenting from a parent POV.
07:26 A. Eyring. I am very concerned that 3-4 years ago, as part of the Facilities Master Plan Committee work, the LASD architect – Gelfand Partners – provided a conceptual sketch for a 650 student k-8 school on 14 acres. [Lalahpolitico: now BCS is 900 students going to 1060 next year, plans on 1200…and the Kohl’s site is just 9.5 acres.]
08:08 A Eyring. The Hillview Middle School in Menlo Park is a bad example. It is 100% a junior high and is able to share more of its spaces. A k-8 need specialized spaces.
08:30 A Eyring. When we made the 5-year agreement four years ago, both parties made enrollment projections. LASD is 500 below its projection. BCS is right on, or a few over its projection of 900.
09:10 You talk a lot about disruption. What about our BCS kids being disrupted by your plan for the Kohls 10th site! And you talk about Measure N as though it were conceived to solve a long-term problem. But no, it was about fixing, here and now immediate issues. There was urgency to fix the current problems. Measure N was not ever focused on fixing a 20 and 30-year future. [which we can’t know]
09:55 If you need a neighborhood school for NEC why is there any conversation about putting BCS at Kohls 10th site. BCS draws from the whole LASD community, across all the attendance areas.
11:10 Rich Ying. Some alternatives have not been vetted. The devil is in the details.
11:40 There is the TDR risk. There is the counterparty risk – if the city of MV places conditions on the $23 million park funds, and you are not operating the site, then you are relying on a 3rd party to fulfill that City of MV condition.
13:00 It would be best to do the design scoping of a building now
13:55 If you buy the Kohls 10th site and only after that you scope the building plan, you will risk a budget bust.
14:20 I echo David Jacques comments about low family formation There are rising construction costs for housing. It’s $6 a square foot now. That means at those high rents, there is not a lot of family formation here. I have talked to the developments at Carmel, Greystar, and Promethesus – the developers who are putting housing in NEC right now. Those are all 1 or 2 bedroom. They don’t build 3’s because they don’t pencil out.
16:50 Rich Ying: You really should do a conceptual building budget before you buy the land.
17:25 Next member: I agree with Vladamir the focus should be on the kids. The questions just create more questions. We should work together.
18:55 Ms. Rao: So you ask are we interested in occupying the Kohls 10th site or not? There are so many unknowns. How many kids can be accommodated there at the 10th site? What will the CEQA say [especially about traffic]? What is the Plan B? What is the Budget? What is the estimated cost?
20:40 Dr. Suttcliffe. How can you do such a large deal without knowing how many kids can be there, with how much space, and who those kids are? Is this the best choice? Is it a possibility that BCS can be on this site? But don’t we think the NEC Community is being mislead and that they will be upset if they are anticipating an NEC neighborhood school ?
22:35 Traffic. BCS traffic at the Kohls 10th site will be worse than NEC neighborhood school traffic. 900 BCSers will be traveling one way while NEC ers travel the other way. What congestion!
23:40 Joe Hurd Thank you for spending time with us. I look forward to more information. Let’s do what is best for all of the students of LASD.
24:35 Francis La Poll makes closing remarks.